Last week there was a lively exchange at the Guardian website, on a comment thread for a blog post by Simon Fletcher, about access to public housing in Britain.
In response to the author’s claim that the difficulties low-income native Britons are finding in obtaining affordable housing “have nothing to do with immigration,” a commentator under the name Zac Smith, weighted in with a public housing allocation list from Birmingham City Council, showing most housing in Birmingham was indeed going to recent immigrants. Then about half way through the thread a commentator named Monnie hit on the main reason why recent immigrants were more likely to receive council housing:
“…migrants jump the queue because they tend to have bigger families and that means they are deemed to have greater priority for housing.”
Family size is a key criteria for preferential treatment by local government authorities and native Britons, with smaller families on average than African or South Asian immigrants, are more likely to lose out.
Unlike skilled middle-class Britons who are able to deal with overcrowding by voting with their feet and moving overseas, the country’s disgruntled working-class natives can’t just up and leave if they can’t find a house.
Traditional blue-collar destinations like Australia only want a limited number of educated and skilled workers from the motherland, while economic stagnation, illegal immigration and language barriers mean Continental Europe is unlikely to appeal to most working-class Britons. Subsequently they have little to lose by supporting immigration restrictionist parties like the much-maligned British National Party.