Monday, November 24, 2008

1990 again?

With the demise of New Zealand First, and National's strong showing in the recent election there appears to be a strong likelihood that immigration is set to increase.

As in 1990, National has got into government with a strong majority during a recessionary period and is keeping conspicuously quiet on immigration matters.

Last time around National's solution to solving the economic downturn was to increase East Asian immigration to stimulate the housing market and attract foreign capital. The economy turned around, but the majority failed to benefit as a yawning gap opened up between wages and house prices.

It's now six years since New Zealand First's strong showing in the 2002 election send a message to the government that the majority of the population wasn't happy with wealth-based, non-western immigration, and there are a number of signs that National is considering opening the immigration floodgates once again.

Firstly it's junior coalition partner Act has a strongly pro-immigration platform - it wants a net immigration inflow of 30,000 -40,000 per year, and it doesn't appear to be very fussy about where they come from (this is pretty high when you consider the country's high level of out-migration to Australia).

Then there's National's unnecessary decision to broker a confidence and supply agreement with the Maori Party. On the surface it might seem strange that National is willing to make a deal with an ethno-centric party whose co-leader has stated she's opposed to white immigration, on the grounds that it's undermining the "browning" of New Zealand (particularly since National voters are overwhelming right liberal whites who are strongly opposed to ethnocentric policies).

However, if the Maori Party is not particularly opposed to non-white immigration, as co-leader Turiana Turia appears to suggest, then there's no reason why it can't work with National on immigration. All National has to do is to restrict white immigration and let in more Polynesians and Asians.

There is also National's plan to loosen up zoning restrictions and cut back the Resource Management Act. If National does intend to increase immigration then its essential that it make more land available for development so that there isn't another sharp increase in house prices as there was in the 1990s.

The demise of New Zealand First means there's no party in parliament with a immigration restrictionist policy to express opposition, since both Labour and the Greens support high immigration levels, and in the case of the Green's, increased refugee quotas.

Hopefully I'm wrong on immigration, but with the election of pro-immigration candidates like Kevin Rudd and Barack Obama in Australia and the U.S it appears New Zealand could be heading down the same path.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

From the NZ First website:

NATIONAL’S IMMIGRATION POLICY: ‘COME ONE COME ALL’

National’s newly released immigration policy shows the party has learnt nothing from its previous immigration failings, says New Zealand First associate immigration spokesman Peter Brown.

“The priorities of our immigration policy must be to ensure that those coming in are doing so to fill genuine labour shortages that cannot be filled by Kiwis, and to ensure that those arriving are of good health and character, and can integrate into our society. National’s plan lacks this necessary focus,” said Mr Brown.

“Instead, National plans to throw open the borders in a style reminiscent of the ‘come one, come all’ open-door policy they oversaw in the 1990’s. This will further depress our already low wages, and put further pressure on housing and infrastructure in cities like Auckland.

“Particularly concerning however, is their plan to lower the English language requirement. National was to blame for flooding this country with people who could not speak English and who were either unwilling or unable to integrate. Thankfully, Labour listened to New Zealand First’s concerns and tightened language and health requirements.

“National further claims that it wants to attract Kiwis back from overseas, yet pushes policies that would see returnees put on a 90 day fire-at-will period and have their holiday entitlements scaled back. Such policies are likely to force more people to leave, not attract them back.

“Unlike National, we would make Immigration New Zealand a stand alone service like Customs or the Police. They want to combine the service with the Department of Internal Affairs, a department responsible for the Fire Service, Civil Defence, gambling and the registration of Births, Deaths and Marriages. Such a move is a most unusual widening of the responsibility of an Immigration service, and is somewhat illogical.

“Overall, the policy is a prime example of the woolly-heading thinking we have come to expect of the National party when it comes to immigration,” said Mr Brown.